Cassation: harassment and threats to employees? Employer may be removed from the city
now on the employer to submit to harassment and threats to their employees threatened with expulsion from the city in which his company. Word of Cassation. I Judges Palazzaccio fact confirmed the prohibition of coercive measures against two of stay employers who underpaid their employees, threatening them with dismissal if they decided to report the facts. According to the Court (28682/2008 Judgement of the Second Criminal Chamber) such conduct constitutes the crime of aggravated extortion and continuous and therefore the removal from the city 'and' a measure of "adequate, since the only appropriate to sever the bond of suspects with the working environment. " The two magnets were discovered through the interception from which it emerged that the suspects had the customary "to pay employees with checks, but then to recover the difference in order to make more 'difficult the acquisition of documents relating to the unlawful conduct ". This behavior and 'went on for a long time since I depend threat had preferred to submit to the view la difficoltà a trovare altre opportunita' di lavoro. Alla fine vi è stata una denuncia collettiva che ha portato alla misura coercitiva del divieto di dimora. Inutile il ricorso in Cassazione. Piazza Cavour ha ribadito la legittimità del provvedimento ricordando che "nel caso in cui il datore di lavoro realizzi una serie di comportamenti estorsivi nei confronti di proprie lavoratrici dipendenti, costringendole ad accettare trattamenti retributivi deteriori e non corrispondenti alle prestazioni effettuate e, in genere, condizioni di lavoro contrarie alla legge e ai contratti collettivi, approfittando della situazione di mercato in cui la domanda di lavoro era di gran lunga superiore all'offerta e quindi, ponendo le dipendenti in una situazione di condizionamento moral, in which rebel against the oppressive conditions is equivalent to losing their jobs, and 'constituting a crime of extortion "under Article and punished. C. p. 629. In this case, then the employer risks being kicked out City 'pending trial.
source: http://www.studiocataldi.it/
0 comments:
Post a Comment